[Pipet Devel] gui protocol revisited
J.W. Bizzaro
bizzaro at geoserve.net
Wed Mar 22 17:48:16 EST 2000
I think the GUI-to-core *API* that Brad and I have been developing for Loci is
very nice. It's a simple dialog of request, approval, and pointing to data.
But what I am questioning is the *protocol* used, which is a standard TCP/IP
socket.
Commands from Loci's XML-based API are streamed across a socket. Here is a
short example where the GUI (front) requests the addition of a new workspace
(subnet), and the core (middle) performs the addition and approves a change in
the GUI to reflect what the core has done:
<front>
<add_workspace>
<workspace id='' >
</workspace>
</add_workspace>
</front>
<middle>
<success>
<workspace id='workspace1' >
</workspace>
</success>
</middle>
So, once again, this API is XML-based and ran through a socket. My question
is: Should we use CORBA instead? What are the advantages/disadvantages? My
MAJOR interest is that we have multiple UIs that can be attached to (and
controlled by) a single core, can run concurrently in the same session, and
can be controlled by one-another (via the front-request, middle-approve API).
Can we do that with CORBA?
Thoughts?
Jeff
--
+----------------------------------+
| J.W. Bizzaro |
| |
| http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ |
| |
| BIOINFORMATICS.ORG |
| The Open Lab |
| |
| http://bioinformatics.org/ |
+----------------------------------+
More information about the Pipet-Devel
mailing list