> > Depends on what you mean by integrated. 90% of Overflow is just a library. > You're actually probably better use that library in GMS instead of the > executables. If you call that integrating Overflow in GMS, well fine, If you > want to wrap the executable, fine too (though I don't think it's the best way). > If you want to take some chunks of code and put that in GMS... have fun(good > luck)! Using the libraries is by far the best methode. I dont want a physical intergration, but there has got to come a general design: which member does what? Example: It's absolutely no problem to me that Overflow can connect to non-local subnets\nodes, but for the collaboration's sake Overflow should have support to disable this. Ex2: GMS will continue to support it's own GUI, I like it for testing. All the flowcharts describe the collaborated situation. > > My only constraint is that I want to be able to use Overflow as a stand alone > application. Agreed.