jarl van katwijk wrote: > > C is more suitable for the 'inbetween' functionality gms will get in the > VSH design. It has more 'hackish' functionality. > But i'm also quite happy about Overflow & GUI being OOP because it makes > sence to build those OOP. I'm happy about the Overflow code staying C++. It's a great choice being OO and binary executable. Python/Gnome is probably the best choice for the GUI too. > OK, then I will communicate with Brad about the details.. any dessision > that will infuence design etc will be posted pubically ofcourse. Keep as much on the list as possible :-) > K, maybe it's logical that you'll do this 'in-between' code that talks to > the gui and the core? Yep. Jeff -- +----------------------------------+ | J.W. Bizzaro | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ | | | | BIOINFORMATICS.ORG | | The Open Lab | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/ | +----------------------------------+