> > (BTW, the argument that 'Dataflow' is redundant could also be applied to > > 'Layer' ;-)) > > Yes, what about: > -User Interface > -Definition > -Brokering > -Processing > OK, but inside the source code I'm in favoir of using the 'L' (UI,DL,BL & PL), just to keep track of the function names, I get mad if I have to stare a few houres at single character names. > > Since we all know they are all layers and that everything's about dataflow > anyway. > > > There are also the 'foreign applications' and 'objects' to consider. We could > > add a... > > > > OAL: Objects and Applications Layer > I don't consider objects to be a layer... they're just objects (now that's new > ;-) ) I agree, the objects are making up the layers.