> > I have something else that worries me more, let's keep up the atmosphere and > call it the pattern problem. It's about how to represent the executables. How > will > we layout the XML that describes the applications? I know we can stream > stdout and stdin data, we can build many 'templates' for a N number of > applications, but this will die a very chaotic death I'm afraid. I myself dont > know > what the best approach is to this XML patterning Piper will use. I'm very much > interested in your comment. > Not that much reply, so maybe this clears things up: http://www.cs.wustl.edu/~schmidt/patterns.html bye, jarl