> > > > I would *very* much like to see this. Right now I am really lost as to > > where Piper is going next and what stuff we should be coding on. > > Oops.. perhaps I got misunderstood... I don't really have time for that... at > least not until I come back from Chicago (Cpeech Coding Workshop... not > everybody is doing bioinformatics :-) ) on the 20th. OK, that leaves this work to me :( I'll hope to have it done tomorrow.. > I think Jarl's numbering scheme is roughly the same as what I am suggesting, but > all with numbers. I think we agree on the principle of a uniform address scheme. Thinking same thing, JM and I (and Brad because he participated in the dl->bl scretch api) want to have the same thing: a Piper wide relocation id. I dont really care how it will be actually implemented, as long as it will be there.