Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > Well, there is a real meaning between these grandma-mother-baby qualifiers, that > would be lost with a BL1, BL2, BL3 scheme. You need only one grandma-BL (Jarl > doesn't use the term, but in my mind it's the part responsible for "centralized > distribution") to control a whole "piper program". You need many mother-BL's > (one on each machine) for one grandma-BL. The same way, there are many baby-BL's > for one mother-BL (many baby-BL's on each machine). If you don't like baby and > grandma, what about super-BL (SBL), mother-BL (MBL) and child-BL (CBL)? Then how about "1st Generation Broker" (G1B), "2nd Generation Broker" (G2B), and "3rd Generation Broker" (G3B)? "Generation" implies the same thing as "Parent/Child". Let me know if I've got this right: G1B (a.k.a. "Granny"): Part of the DL code base. Spawns or communicates with multiple G2B's G2B (a.k.a. "Mommy"): The BL code base written by Jarl. Spawns or communicates with multiple G3B's G3B (a.k.a. "Baby"): Part of the PL code base. Jeff -- J.W. Bizzaro jeff at bioinformatics.org Director, Bioinformatics.org: The Open Lab http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." -- Martin Luther King, Jr. --