Jean-Marc wrote: [CORBA stuff] > You're right, the only thing I was a bit worried was that it would > change in > later versions of the (L)GPL. Right, but I guess it doesn't sound like it from Richard Stallman's mail, so I guess we shouldn't speculate about it if the lawyers aren't! [...my simplistic view of linking...] > It's not as simple as that. You can link a closed-source program with > an LGPL library, but whether you can link the library (libdata-flow) to a > closed source plugin (library) is unclear. So what does this mean? That there is no way that anyone could "legally" write a non-free plugin, even if we use a LGPL license? Does this relate to just using a plugin or to writing and "distributing"/selling a plugin? Damn, licenses make my head hurt! > Do you want "one license for every part" or the same license for all > the parts, > it's unclear to me? I am for the same overall license for all of the parts. I would like Piper to just be one big program and all be covered together under the exact same license. At least, that is my vote :-). Brad