[Pipet Devel] ideas for a smaller piper core

Jean-Marc Valin jmvalin at locusdialogue.com
Mon May 28 11:07:43 EDT 2001

> So, what are your thoughts on this?  Yes, no?

No. This will make matters even more complicated, since we'd have to
support Piper without Overflow and Piper with Overflow. Besides that, I
managed to get rid of most of Overflow dependencies. The only required
library is now libxml, which is used by the DL anyway. It would also be
easy to put the Overflow tree into the Piper tree for releases, so
there's no big deal...

Last thing I was not sure I understood from your previous mail: were you
thinking of allowing another PL than Overflow or releasing Piper without
a PL at all. Either way, I don't think I see the point...


More information about the Pipet-Devel mailing list