This genome is small enough that it might be worth using Ewan Birney's WISE tools (http://www.ebi.ac.uk/Wise2/ and ftp://ftp.ebi.ac.uk/pub/software/unix/wise2/) to look for matches against PFAM or any PFAM-like database of HMMs. Ordinarily, this method is dreadfully slow (it's that old theme of sensitivity vs. speed), but 2.4kb should be manageable. This will take care of possible frameshifts because the program knows how to deal with them. Aside from this, I would work only with predicted ORFs, as viral genomes are known to be very divergent and it doesn't surprise me that you don't see much similarity at DNA level. Last time I tried it, Glimmer did OK on viral genomes, especially if you filter the initial results with RBSFinder (both programs are available at http://www.tigr.org/software/). Cheers, Mensur At 05:06 PM 2/12/2004, you wrote: >i All, > >I am looking at a novel 2.4 KB viral genome and want to see if anything >homologous is known. > >Have tried blastn,blastx variants but nothing comes up (possibly due to >frame or simply divergence). > >This beastie may replicate in the mitochondria of vertebrates so >translations may need to use mito not nuclear codons. > >Please let me know if you have any suggestions or experience looking at >similar sequences. > >Thank you, > >Tristan ========================================================================== | Mensur Dlakic, Ph.D. | Tel: (406) 994-6576 | | Department of Microbiology | Fax: (406) 994-4926 | | Montana State University | http://www.umich.edu/~mensur/ | | 109 Lewis Hall, P.O. Box 173520 | http://myprofile.cos.com/mensur | | Bozeman, MT 59717-3520 | E-mail: mdlakic at montana.edu | ==========================================================================