Hi all, did somebody recently do a Blast benchmark of dual-P3s versus dual-P4s versus dual-Athlon-MPs? For example blast human against mouse, or human against pufferfish. Is it correct that, say, 1.6 GHz (1900+) dual-Athlon-MPs are faster than, say, 2.2 GHz dual-P4s? How much faster? We did some really extensive benchmarks last fall, and we obtained quite consistently the following results: 1.1 GHz dual-Tualatins (with SDRAM) were slightly faster than 1.2 GHz dual-Athlon-MPs (with DDR RAM) were slightly faster than dual-P4-xeons (with RDRAM at that time) ... perhaps because of the following reason: Tualatins/Athlons/P4-xeons have (or had) 512/384/256 kB L2 cache, and apparently cache size is (or was) crucial for Blast. Hence, we decided against dual-P4-xeons (obvious because of the above and because they were really expensive last year and because they required RDRAM, which was really really expensive last year, particularly when at least 2 GB RAM per node are needed) and also against dual-Athlon-MPs. The choice of Tualatin versus Athlon was harder, and what counted in our case was not only the slightly superior performance, but the simple fact that we had (and still have) extremely limited space. I wonder how this comparison has changed after the P4s are now - produced on a smaller die, hence requiring less power and producing less heat, - clocked at 2.2 GHz, - equipped with 512 kB L2 cache? Also, could anyone send a comparison of RDRAM versus DDR RAM (with respect to the performance of Blast)? And, could anyone comment on the thermal stability 1U dual-Athlon-MP nodes (if, say, 40 of them are stacked in a single 40U rack and if all of the CPUs are running full speed pretty much 24 hours a day and 7 days a week)? Thanks a lot! Ivo