Hi Chris and other bioclusterers, I just stumbled upon http://www.sistina.com/products_gfs.htm, which states that one advantage of GFS (combined with Mosix?) is that it "Eliminates NFS Bottlenecks," and as example these guys list "Life Sciences" and "Shared BLAST databases." Independently of the fact that these guys charge $1000/node (Am I correct?), I wonder if their claims are correct? Can Mosix -- by using GFS -- really achieve a high I/O throughput? A related question is: does Mosix work together with PVFS? Best regards, Ivo >>> chris dagdigian bioclusters@bioinformatics.org Tue, 05 Mar 2002 11:16:51 -0500 ... (1) My limited experience with MOSIX has me believing that in the MOSIX world a process that is doing heavy I/O operations will never get migrated across to a less loaded machine. This alone is enough for me to not consider MOSIX/SSI for bioclusters because all of the ones I have built so far are very, very often used for IO-bound embarassingly parallel jobs (blast, genscan, etc. etc). Am I totally wrong? Anyone out there using SSI/Mosix systems for hardcore biology stuff? <<<