Chris, Given that globus 2 is supposed to be replaced by globus 3 in the very near future - and given that globus 3 is supposedly a major re-architecting (can you tell that I speak from a position of extreme ignorance on this topic?), is putting effort into a globus 2 port worthwhile? We've been told that we should be reading up on version 3 because it simply makes no sense to commit to anything based on 2. Later, Andy ------------- Yada, yada, yada... The information contained in this e-mail (including any attachments) is confidential and is intended for the use of the addressee only. The opinions expressed within this e-mail (including any attachments) are the opinions of the sender and do not necessarily constitute those of Roslin Institute (Edinburgh) ("the Institute") unless specifically stated by a sender who is duly authorised to do so on behalf of the Institute. > -----Original Message----- > From: Chris Dagdigian [mailto:dag@sonsorol.org] > Sent: 30 May 2003 22:31 > To: bioclusters@bioinformatics.org; biodarwin@bioinformatics.org; > biodevelopers@bioinformatics.org > Subject: [Bioclusters] Mac OS X build notes for globus-2.2.2 > > > > Bill Van Etten did this and I'm just getting around to > putting the notes > online. I followed the instructions and it took a few hours to get > everything sorted on a powerbook. If there is enough interest > perhaps we > can create a unified patch file or something. > > Note: no instant gratification here. You need to get your > certs signed > by the globus.org certificate authority. > > The notes are posted here: > http://bioteam.net/MacOSX/Globus-build-notes.txt > > -Chris > > _______________________________________________ > Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org > https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters >