On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Joe Landman wrote: >Ok .... > >Dan Bolser wrote: > >>On Fri, 24 Sep 2004, Joe Landman wrote: >> >> >> >>>Hi Dan: >>> >>> What size memory do you have on the test machine? >>> >>> >> >>1548036k >> >> > >Use at least 3 GB as your test size (you used 2GB). Linux is agressive >on buffer caching in 2.4 (almost to a fault). Bonnie complains when I go over 2047 Mb. Not sure if I need to compile it differently for my system? >>Here is the new result for scsi/ide/nfs >> >> -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- >> -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- >>Machi MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU >>scs 2047 15781 91.0 33870 20.5 14318 6.1 12880 66.7 33974 8.3 234.0 1.3 >> >> >>Seeker 1...Seeker 2...Seeker 3...start 'em...done...done...done... >> -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- >> -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- >>Machi MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU >>ide 2047 17293 96.4 42104 28.2 18361 8.5 16149 83.9 60721 15.6 141.6 0.7 >> >> > >So your IDE is about 9.6% faster on per char writes, 24% faster on block >writes, 28% faster on rewrites, 25% faster on per char reads, and ~79% >faster on block reads. What technology/make/manufacturer are the disks? Thanks very much for your help on interpreting the results - I can follow but it would have taken me longer to make sense of the figures. Sorry but I forget the details of my system. I remember we bought 'fast' scsi to support some 'big' jobs I was doing when I first started. How can I probe these details remotely? >> -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- >> -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- >>Machi MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU >>nfs 2047 4863 69.2 10959 8.0 11380 8.2 7000 100.0 1520816 100.1 2901.2 17.4 >> >> > >I am having lots of trouble with your block reads. It appears to be >reading at 1.5 GB/s, while writing at 0.01 GB/s. This is either rather >asymmetric, or possibly wrong. What are your mount options? What type >of NFS server and what type of network? I would tremendously respect >any NFS device that can pump out 1.5 GB/s, though I would be hard >pressed to find a single connection that could support that speed. I >would expect over fast ethernet that your sequential input would be >close to 11000-13000 for a really well tuned server and client, and >60000-80000 for a really well tuned gigabit connected system. The 1.5M >number is 20x what I expect. I am intrigued ... Me too :) I will ask the IT guys on monday. The NFS server was pricey I remember that (our first solution was an extremly cheap raid card - it worked but was unstable). We have a fiber connection somewhere, but I know very little about networks in general. However, 20x sounds too good to be true. Mount uses default options. The machine running the NFS test has 4124716k memory. Again I have the Bonnie size limit problem. I am running a test on my machine (1548036k memory) over an SMB mount just for 'sanity', but that seems to be lacking. Thanks again, Dan. > >> >> >> >> >> >>> I usually use 2-4 GB for my tests on machines with 1 GB or less >>>memory. Some of the numbers look a little off. The SCSI rewrite speed >>>is 4x the IDE rewrite speed, and the IDE seems to be doing 133MB/s on >>>sequential writes (cool, but I don't believe it unless you have a >>>multiway RAID0, or an IDE raid card with a big honking cache ..., I >>>have hit a sustained 110 MB/s on 2 way IDE RAID0's properly tuned). >>> >>>Joe >>> >>>Dan Bolser wrote: >>> >>> >>> >>>>FYI: >>>> >>>>Here is my local SCSI and IDE disk for comparison (size 104857600 again) >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- >>>> -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- >>>>Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU >>>>scsi 100 10537 76.3 44958 32.5 108986 44.7 12314 74.6 418500 98.1 22027.8 88.1 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- >>>> -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- >>>>Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU >>>>ide 100 13921 89.5 133969 81.1 27470 11.8 14553 87.6 430990 96.8 21952.2 93.3 >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -------Sequential Output-------- ---Sequential Input-- --Random-- >>>> -Per Char- --Block--- -Rewrite-- -Per Char- --Block--- --Seeks--- >>>>Machine MB K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU K/sec %CPU /sec %CPU >>>>nfs 100 4240 25.9 5437 2.1 4780 2.4 19595 100.1 566942 99.7 2023.0 10.1 >>>> >>>> >>>>_______________________________________________ >>>>Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org >>>>https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >> >>_______________________________________________ >>Bioclusters maillist - Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org >>https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters >> >> > >