[BiO BB] Fish genomics
    Ryan Golhar 
    golharam at umdnj.edu
       
    Tue May  9 11:14:54 EDT 2006
    
    
  
You should read the papers that publish the genomes for these different
species.  
They mention the reason behind sequencing their genome.  I remember from
the fugu paper - Fugu is a distant cousin of humans and has a very
compact genome, about 1/8 in size.  As such, it lacks a lot of "junk
dna" aka introns and intergenic regions leaving it genome mostly
functional.  It should help in determining what is functional in human
versus what is non-functional. 
Also, look at the website that make the genomes available - NCBI, UCSC,
Ensemble, etc.  If you read their "About" pages, you should get more
information...
Ryan
-----Original Message-----
From: bio_bulletin_board-bounces+golharam=umdnj.edu at bioinformatics.org
[mailto:bio_bulletin_board-bounces+golharam=umdnj.edu at bioinformatics.org
] On Behalf Of Nagesh Chakka
Sent: Tuesday, April 25, 2006 3:37 AM
To: bio_bulletin_board at bioinformatics.org
Subject: [BiO BB] Fish genomics
Hi All,
I just started work with fish genomes for my comparative study. I am a 
bit puzzled as to why three different fish species were selected for 
sequencing (Danio rerio </Danio_rerio/>, Fugu rubripes, 
</Fugu_rubripes/>and Tetraodon nigroviridis). Is there is any advantage
in each of these species selected for sequencing which is not there in 
the other? I am addressing this question to this forum as I have a 
feeling that someone out there may be working with fish genome and may 
be having extensive information about what I was looking for. Please 
also note that I could not find any straight forward answer to my 
question searching the web. </Tetraodon_nigroviridis/>
Thanks
Nagesh
_______________________________________________
Bioinformatics.Org general forum  -
BiO_Bulletin_Board at bioinformatics.org
https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bio_bulletin_board
    
    
More information about the BBB
mailing list