[Bioclusters] how are the Redhat product changes affecting existing and future plans?

[Nox]

Glad we stuck with debian.
	The intent when we began with deb was to develop 
a Cluster specific deb version, which we are still working on.
(Not just FAI but fully optimized)

I would love to know if anyone plans on testing out that 
MandrakeClustering, and if you could post your findings.

I just switched from woody to drake 9.2 on my desktop,
and am very happy so far with it. (Although I miss apt-get)

So I would love to see it in some high computation environments

Nox
GenMicro Systems


On Tue, 2003-11-04 at 12:31, Matt Temple wrote:
> >
> << snip >>
> 
> > It's left us wondering is SuSe will be the only option... that is if 
> > the
> > recently announced Novell acquisition doesn't fundamentally change 
> > their
> > operations.
> >
> 
> There's  a good deal of discussion around the web about this -- also
> on the business sites.   RedHat "marginalized"?   But what will Novell
> do with this?
> 
> It leaves a kind of interesting scenario -- with Fedora and
> Debian as the best functioning distributions in the original
> spirit of Linux.   It's inevitable the someone will try to make
> money from Linux.   But with Novell and RH going the enterprise
> route, you can imagine that some day they could outdo SCO
> by suing their own communities for some infringement on some proprietary
> thing they've invented!  Am I being too cynical?  (oxymoron)
> 
> 										Matt
> 
> ========================================================
> Matthew Temple                Tel:    617/632-2597
> Director, Research Computing  Fax:    617/632-4012
> Dana-Farber Cancer Inst       mht@research.dfci.harvard.edu
> 44 Binney Street,  M L105     http://research.dfci.harvard.edu
> Boston, MA 02115              Choice is the Choice!
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Bioclusters maillist  -  Bioclusters@bioinformatics.org
> https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/bioclusters