[Biococoa-dev] Moving on
Koen van der Drift
kvddrift at earthlink.net
Sun Jul 10 21:18:15 EDT 2005
On Jul 10, 2005, at 8:50 PM, Charles Parnot wrote:
> I really think this is too much!! Grouping atoms, residues and symbols
> under a same superclass makes sense. But the BCSequence object is
> really a collection of such things, so it is really weird to have that
> under the same class tree. Also, I agree that it has the same physical
> properties, as it is a moelcule too. But for some reason, it seems you
> have some kind of mass spec bias. I don't know where that comes from
> I think haveing the sequence objects in the same class hierarchy would
> be confusing and overkill. What do the others think?
It's all under the hood, and has no influence on the project. Compare
it to NSObject which is the superclass of a wide variety of classes,
that have nothing in common with each other.
I have removed the original class (BCStructuralObject) and will wait
with adding BCStructuralElement until we get some more opinions.
More information about the Biococoa-dev