[ghemical-devel] Re: mopac status?

[Joerg K. Wegner]

Hi,

this sounds good, evetually the JavaNativeInterface interface under 
Linux will be more stable with this changes.
IDM JDK works perfectly, SUN's JDK not ?

Regards, Joerg


> When replying, PLEASE edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> than "Re: ghemical-devel digest, Vol..."
> 
> 
> Today's Topics:
> 
>    1. Re: mopac status? (Geoff Hutchison)
>    2. Re: mopac status? (Michael Banck)
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 1
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 10:13:06 -0500
> Subject: Re: [ghemical-devel] mopac status?
> Cc: ghemical-devel@bioinformatics.org
> To: Tommi Hassinen <thassine@messi.uku.fi>
> From: Geoff Hutchison <hutchisn@chem.northwestern.edu>
> 
>>Lately my time has gone mostly in force field parameter work and in the
>>bonobo business. I have not yet separated the "libmopac7" but now 
>>there is
>>a sourceforge project for that :
>>
>>	http://sourceforge.net/projects/mopac7/
>>
>>and the mopac source is at CVS there.
> 
> 
> Today I was investigating some C++ libraries for numerical computing 
> (e.g. replacements for LAPACK) for a colleague and came across this:
> 
> QC++ (a C++ implementation of MNDO, AM1, and PM3)
> http://www.labri.fr/Perso/~okon/
> 
> It says "QC++ is freely available under Linux, IBM AIX and SGI Irix 
> with authorization from the authors." I wonder if they might be willing 
> to move to a GPL-compatible license. If so, it would solve many of our 
> "libmopac" problems, since it would already be developed.
> 
> -Geoff
> (Who is currently finishing his dissertation this fall and doesn't have 
> the time he'd like to devote to Ghemical or Open Babel. :-(
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> Message: 2
> Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 18:00:49 +0200
> From: Michael Banck <mbanck@gmx.net>
> To: ghemical-devel@bioinformatics.org
> Subject: Re: [ghemical-devel] mopac status?
> 
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:13:06AM -0500, Geoff Hutchison wrote:
> 
>>Today I was investigating some C++ libraries for numerical computing 
>>(e.g. replacements for LAPACK) for a colleague and came across this:
>>
>>QC++ (a C++ implementation of MNDO, AM1, and PM3)
>>http://www.labri.fr/Perso/~okon/
> 
> 
> Cool.
> 
> 
>>It says "QC++ is freely available under Linux, IBM AIX and SGI Irix 
>>with authorization from the authors." I wonder if they might be willing 
>>to move to a GPL-compatible license. If so, it would solve many of our 
>>"libmopac" problems, since it would already be developed.
> 
> 
> Do you have time asking them? If not, I'd be willing to volunteer.
> 
> 
> Michael
> 
> 
> --__--__--
> 
> _______________________________________________
> ghemical-devel mailing list
> ghemical-devel@bioinformatics.org
> http://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/ghemical-devel
> 
> 
> End of ghemical-devel Digest
> 


-- 
Dipl. Chem. Joerg K. Wegner
Center of Bioinformatics Tuebingen (ZBIT)
Department of Computer Architecture
Univ. Tuebingen, Sand 1, D-72076 Tuebingen, Germany
Phone: (+49/0) 7071 29 78970
Fax: (+49/0) 7071 29 5091
E-Mail: mailto:wegnerj@informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
WWW:    http://www-ra.informatik.uni-tuebingen.de
--
Never mistake motion for action.
                          E. Hemingway