On Wed, 26 Jul 2006, Geoffrey Hutchison wrote: > Actually, what would be really nice is if the ghemical engine would > substitute parameters from neighbors in the periodic table instead. So if I > simulate Si and no parameters exist, it uses carbon but with a larger vdW > radius. Same thing for Se using S parameters, etc. Hello, this would work pretty well for distances and radii, but I'm afraid it would be too inaccurate for angle and torsion terms. :( I'm going to add better mol.mech. parameterizations later, but right now I don't have the time I need. > A quick search turned up some interesting links: > > Validation of the general purpose tripos 5.2 force field > http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/jcc.540100804 This paper is the one where I got the tripos 5.2 parameters we are using now. Regards, Tommi