On Jul 27, 2006, at 2:36 AM, Tommi Hassinen wrote: >> Actually, what would be really nice is if the ghemical engine >> would substitute parameters from neighbors in the periodic table >> instead. So if I simulate Si and no parameters exist, it uses >> carbon but with a larger vdW radius. Same thing for Se using S >> parameters, etc. > > this would work pretty well for distances and radii, but I'm afraid > it would be too inaccurate for angle and torsion terms. :( You're telling me that it's more inaccurate than using hydrogen parameters? Yes, I agree that it's worse than having accurate parameters for a range of elements. But I don't see why it's bad for late-period elements of the same family -- better than nothing! Just my $0.02, -Geoff