[Molvis-list] Additional questions
Trans-Laboratory -- Chemical Analysis Service Provider --
trans.lab at skynet.be
Fri Nov 19 17:39:00 EST 2004
Dear Dan,
Did those slides mentioned below get posted somewhere? Thank you in advance
Ricardo A. Correa C.
Molecular Biology amateur
Cheers!
Dan.
On Sat, 9 Oct 2004, Gabe McCool wrote:
>Dan-
>
>Sounds great...looking forward to seeing your slides at some point.
>Further to Eric Martz's FtsZ suggestion, the presentation at
>
>http://www.umass.edu/microbio/chime/pipe/ftsz/present/index.htm
>
>tries to point out FtsZ's close structural alignment with tubulin
>contrasted with the low seq identity (<20%) between aligned FtsZ + tubulin
aa
>sequences. Hope its helpful in some regard.
>
>
>Gabe McCool
>
>
>
>
>> From: Eric Martz <emartz at microbio.umass.edu>
>> Reply-To: <rasmol at lists.umass.edu>
>> Date: Fri, 08 Oct 2004 17:40:02 -0400
>> To: <rasmol at lists.umass.edu>
>> Subject: Re: Slides to demonstrate conservation of protein structure?
>>
>> At 10/8/04, Dan Bolser <dmb at mrc-dunn.cam.ac.uk> wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I would like to demonstrate the well known principal that protein
>>> structure is more conserved than protein sequence in evolutionary
>>> time. I am presenting to a group of structural biologists, so I want
>>> to emphasize the bioinformatic perspective.
>>>
>>> My idea for a series of slides is this
>>>
>>> 1) show two clearly structurally similar (same topology) protein
domains.
>>
>> One example pointed out to me years ago by Gabe McCool is the
>> bacterial cell division protein FtsZ. A structure-based search turns
>> up tubulin, but the sequence identity is only 16% (if I recall).
>>
>> This paper by Friedberg, Kaplan and Margalit
>> http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=pubmed&
>> dopt=Abst
>> ract&list_uids=11152139
>> assesses
>> "the accuracy of PSI-BLAST alignments on a stringent database of 123
>> structurally similar, sequence-dissimilar pairs of proteins, by
>> comparing them to the alignments defined on a structural basis."
>>
>> I will be quite interested in your slides when they become available!
>> Please keep us posted.
>> -Eric Martz
>>
>>> 1.1) show that the two sequences are very different, and result in
>>> a 'bad' sequence alignment (somehow visually).
>>>
>>> 2) Show a nieve (and hopefully bad) structural alignment of the two
>>> domains based (nievely) on the sequence alignment.
>>>
>>> 3) Show a pure (and simple) structural alignment of the two domains.
>>> 3.1) Show the sequence alignment based on the good structural alignment.
>>>
>>>
>>> My idea is to convey the importance of structure in recognizing
>>> distant homology between domains.
>>>
>>> I want to use a real example using real tools, but I am not sure how
>>> / which tools to use.Any suggetions? Good demo / bad demo? Naturally
>>> I need this done by yesterday, so the simpler the tools the better.
>>>
>>> I will be happy to post the slides somewhere appropriate to share
>>> this work with the world.
>>>
>>> All the best,
>>> Dan.
-----Original Message-----
From: molvis-list-admin at bioinformatics.org
[mailto:molvis-list-admin at bioinformatics.org] On Behalf Of Dan Bolser
Sent: 19 November 2004 16:41
To: molvis-list at bioinformatics.org
Subject: Re: [Molvis-list] Additional questions
My favourite bond prediction server is ...
http://www.mrc-lmb.cam.ac.uk/genomes/nci/
However, it looks down for the time being.
Here is the reference...
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=168935
It predicts canonical bonds as well as 'non-canonical', but not
electrostatic interactions (as far as I know).
Predicting quaternary structure is a big field, with many different groups
trying many different approaches. I would suggest you ask your question here
pdb-l at rcsb.org
All the best,
Dan.
On Thu, 18 Nov 2004, [iso-2022-jp] $BHSDM(B $B at 2@8(B wrote:
>Dear members
>
>Some times ago, I asked you about H-bonds visualization in homodimer.
>But I had additional questions following below.
>
>1.How to detect monomer-monomer interactions, H-bonds, hydrophobic
> interactions and electrostatic interactions etc. And Which
>visualization-
> tool is best for visualizing them?
>
>2.Are there any tools to predict quaternary structures and it's interaction
> sites from tertiary structures?
>
>Tell me please.
>
>>From H.Iiduka
>
>e-mail: haruo_ii at hotmail.com
>
>_________________________________________________________________
>$B3Z$7$$3(J8;z$G%3%3%mEA$o$k%a%C%;%s%8%c!<(B
>http://messenger.msn.co.jp/
>
>_______________________________________________
>Molvis-list mailing list
>Molvis-list at bioinformatics.org
>https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/molvis-list
>
_______________________________________________
Molvis-list mailing list
Molvis-list at bioinformatics.org
https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/molvis-list
More information about the Molvis-list
mailing list