oops.. I didn't mean to post to the list. Lets see if I can survive the spam ... ;-) On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, timothy driscoll wrote: >On 2004-11-21 (18:28) Dan Bolser wrote: >> >>I have a few comments, but I am not sure if people would care enough >>to 'vote' on the issue yet... >> >>Email spoofing is rare, so having a subscriber only policy gets rid >>of most spam attacks (which on the whole are opportunist and not >>directed). Mailman on bioinformatics.org should be compatible with a >>spam filter, bouncing suspicious email to the sender automatically, >>and automatically allowing it through on the completion of some >>'human' task. >> >hi Dan, > > >I much prefer those lists that require you to respond to an email in >order to confirm your list subscription. others force you to read a >word embedded in an image (somewhat distorted to prevent bot >subscribing). not so keen on that. > > >>In the same vein, it is very simple to configure procmail or the >>like to pickup mail with the word unsubscribe in the header and send >>it to the list admin. >> >very true - or let the list members handle it. I have seen some quite >creative and ROTFL responses to such requests - especially when the list >info is at the bottom of every message! :-) > > >>I never had a problem with spam on unmoderated lists at bioinfo.org, >>but then again I have hefty spam filters this end. (Please feel free >>to put my email address anywhere you like - I welcome the spam so my >>filter can learn more :) - Besides it could be a good experiment ;) >> >you must be running a Bayesian filter - SpamSieve, perhaps? ;-) > > > > >> >> >>On Sun, 21 Nov 2004, Eric Martz wrote: >> >>>At 11/20/04, you wrote: >>> >>>>Can I ask why this list is moderated? >>>> >_______________________________________________ >Molvis-list mailing list >Molvis-list at bioinformatics.org >https://bioinformatics.org/mailman/listinfo/molvis-list >