J.W. Bizzaro wrote: > Justin Bradford wrote: > > > > I pretty sure I'm going to be accepted for an internship at Genentech this > > summer, working in the biocomputing division. > > Congratulations! I know you'll be a great asset to them, as you are to us. > > > In the interview, the > > director of this division was asking a lot of questions about Loci, and > > seems very interested. > > That's good, I think. > > > > > Basically, they develop bioinformatic tools and client/middleware > > interface software so the researchers can easily access these > > bioinformatic tools and databases from easy-to-use interfaces over the > > network. > > > > Sound familiar? > > A little ;-) > > > > > So far they've basically been doing Perl/CGI access just using netscape. > > They are wanting to start making use of Java applets to make better > > interfaces, too. > > > > I was having some trouble explaining the Loci design to him, but we're > > basically doing the same thing. Well, except that the Loci design is > > substantially more powerful, flexible, easier to use, and provides better > > client views. After we're done writing it, of course ;) > > We're trying. I'm beginning to think that our time spent thinking and > rethinking the design of Loci has been very beneficial, even though nothing has > been written. Had we just jumped in and started coding, there were be less of a > difference between Loci and other concoctions. > > But of course, vaporware is vaporware ;-) > > > > > I have a friend who used to work out there, and he tells me they have some > > absolutely brilliant people in the biocomputing/bioinformatics division > > (although they're probably doing development on the bioinformatic > > tools rather than the interface/network stuff). Given the overlap and > > general interest they showed towards the Loci concept, it might not be too > > big of a stretch to get genentech interested in the project. Or, at least, > > maybe I can attract a few developers there. > > I have no problems with the prospect that a business might get involved. Harry > Mangalam also mentioned that NCGR might be interested in extending Loci (see Feb > 27 e-mail from Harry). We are licensing Loci as LGPL rather than GPL so that it > can be extended with proprietary programs. (This does bring up the issue of > using _some_ GPL code in Loci...as with Dia...I'm concerned that we can't have > any GPL code, that it has to be all LGPL.) > > Red Hat, for example, was responsible for most of the GNOME development, and it > didn't matter that it was a business. It is up to a company to use the GNU > license, and by doing so they are disclaiming their "rights" to make the > software closed and proprietary at some point in the future (the GPL and LGPL > are indelible). > > > > > They have a cross-platform concern, too, with Windows and MacOS, and > > probably some unix, desktops. Has anyone heard about a GTK port to MacOS? > > > > I agree with Rahul that a MacOS 10 port would be simpler than the Windows port, > which already exists. Of course because OS 10 is UNIX-based (it uses the Mach > kernel). > > > P.S. I'll actually get around to setting up CVS, SSH, etc. on the new > > server this weekend. I promise. Any thing else we need on it? > > I have the RPM's for SSH2 already there. This is the directory where I like to > archive RPM's: > > /usr/opt/arc/RPMS/ > > You'll find them there. As for myself, I will be installing BigBrother (Web > stats) and Mailman (list server). > > > > > P.S.S. Thanks J.W. for starting this project. It played a big part in this > > getting (probably) this internship. > > You're very welcome! This news has made my day, really. Let me know how it > turns out. > > Jeff > -- > J.W. Bizzaro mailto:bizzaro at bc.edu > Boston College Chemistry http://www.uml.edu/Dept/Chem/Bizzaro/ > > I have always appreciated your ability to ________, whenever > there has been a blank to fill. > -- To all: I'm glad to see this enterprise succeeding and Justin getting a job............Ken Marx