> > Well, I'll leave it up to you. I don't think it's bad the way the sizes are > now. But if you're asking me what I'd do, I might make the logos 75% of their > current size... np and use 1/4-sized backgrounds. (But 219 images?! That's a lot of > resizing.) Then the browser would only be downloading ~10 kB in graphics for > each page. Most modems will do that in 2 seconds. I used the GIMP to reduce > the backgrounds, BTW. may be a prob. I'm pretty sure you can run gimp from command line. It may be possible to write a script (script-fu?) to resize the backgrounds. > > Check out the huge graphics that VA Linux just put up on their site: > > http://www.valinux.com/ > > For some reason, downloading the VA pages takes a lot of processing power from > my CPU. > Yeah mine too. From that perspective, I think our pages are pretty efficient :-)