"J.W. Bizzaro" wrote: > > I think if individual loci are responsible for supplying or identifying their > own XML translators, Loci will be much more flexible. Of course if we use DOM, as Justin suggested, then I'm talking about DOM->CPL (command-line program) and CPL->DOM translators. Humberto wrote: > > Paos could also be modified to use a DOM->XML module rather than pickle > > for storage (and even transport). > > Storage isn't a problem, but I think transport should definitely be in XML > > > Furthermore, it would make it simpler > > (possible?) for non-python nodes to communicate in the system. > > Another big reason for doing transport in a standard format. Why? Isn't Justin talking about a standardized DOM? I'm a bit confused as to where we should draw the line between DOM and XML. I'll take a guess...DOM isn't on the filesystem while XML is :-) Jeff -- J.W. Bizzaro mailto:bizzaro at bc.edu Boston College Chemistry http://www.uml.edu/Dept/Chem/Bizzaro/ --