> > The only problem with remote DL's is that the (local) root DL must > know about > > that remote one in order to authoritized it. > > Okay, I think we are saying the same thing--that a local dl has to > accept a connection from a remote dl and get it authorized to use the > local bl. This will be occuring in a (not yet defined) dl->dl corba > connection. Right. > > > > (note: the transported data will be encrypted with the DL password > as key.) > > Man, Jarl, you are awesome! This just helped me figure out a problem I > was having with secure password storage in the dl. Thanks! > N.P. , gonna forward this to a lot of people :-) > > > > > Maybe this new field of the uriS will make this possible? > > so it will be like this (simplyfied): > > struct uriS { > > long instaceID; > > long groupID; //aint the same as the unix 'group' !! > > long subnetID; > > long nodeID; > > }; > > > > Giving any lead? > > Okay, so a group is "smaller" than a instanceID, and groups subnets > and nodes and not users. Am I following you correctly? > Yep! Sorry about the short answers, kinda buzy @work.