> Jean-Marc Valin wrote: >> >> Also, I guess we should all agree on a version of libXML. They broke source >> compatibility twice after the release I'm using (1.7.3). For 1.8 it was > minor, >> but they changed all the names in version 2. Jarl wrote: > Ic, what do you think about stability\features, which version is best? > And which version would requier as less work as possible? Jeff wrote: > I don't see any reason to continue with obsolete versions. We should follow > Gnome's progression to Gnome 1.2 and 2.0. I don't really know anything about libXML (since I'm using python xml tools) but I read somewhere there was a SAX interface for libXML (...looking for it...okay, here is tutorial on it -> http://developer.gnome.org/doc/tutorials/xml-sax/xml-sax.html). Could you guys use that interface? It seems like the SAX parsing interface should remain stable (that is the point of SAX, I guess) so then you wouldn't have to worry about the interfaces changes to libXML. This is basically what I do in python, and then I don't have to worry about underlying changes in the parsers. Or is it the SAX interface that is changing? (in which case I'm completely off base and should be smacked around :) Brad