"J.W. Bizzaro" a écrit : > > jarl van katwijk wrote: > > > > > Well, my impression is that we're working toward a unified system, distributed > > > in a single tarball. I think we need to agree on one license. > > > > ok, LGPL. > > So, Jarl and I agree on LGPL for everything. Jean-Marc? It may actually be > most important for the PL (Overflow library) to be LGPL, since it will be the > layer to interface with foreign applications. LGPL is OK for me. Though I propose the same license modification as in Linux: allow linking with closed-source binaries. Overflow can use foreign nodes and types compiled in a shared library. This is forbidden by the (L)GPL, unless it is explicitly allowed, as for the Linux kernel (which allow closed-source drivers). Anyone thinks this is bad? Jean-Marc