On Thu, 17 Feb 2000, J.W. Bizzaro wrote: > There is an interesting article and discussion about this scripting language > war. Here is a comment posted by a (former) Perl programmer: > > --------------------------------------- > It's sort of like a really clean C++ with the convenience of Perl. > > I would HIGHLY recommend Python as being something you need to learn and start > using! I mean, Perl is good for hacking stuff together because you know how to > do it in Perl. Even Bash is good for that.. But Python really gives you a good > feeling that you are architecting something that is made to work, made to > last, and made to be maintainable. And Python is extremely good for quick > Perl-ish hack jobs. I agree completely ;) (and I am coordinating bioperl!). But Perl is ultimately portable has an incredible set of extensions - CPAN and the killer 95% of bioinformaticians use Perl But I honestly believe the future is jpython/java objects on the server, python/jpython/possibly perl on the scripting/driving side. Hence the biocorba stuff. > > Maybe Perl (in reference to an above post) is for artists, but I think Python > is for designers. Know which one you are, before you do anything else. > ---------------------------------------- > > http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=00/02/16/1729227&mode=flat > > Cheers. > Jeff > -- > +----------------------------------+ > | J.W. Bizzaro | > | | > | http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ | > | | > | BIOINFORMATICS.ORG | > | The Open Lab | > | | > | http://bioinformatics.org/ | > +----------------------------------+ > > _______________________________________________ > BioPython mailing list - BioPython at biopython.org > http://biopython.org/mailman/listinfo/biopython >