> Hmmmmmmmm. In Overflow, the little dots on the edges of the nodes are > "terminals" then? Terminal is a better name for the way it appears in > Overflow. In Peep, "Link" may actually be a better name, since it is > something like a symlink on the Unix command-line. I think "Link" is confusing because a link is a connection between two different connectors (or terminii). If we are deciding on naming, what I'd like to have is: Connector -> One part of a thing that will make up a link (ie. inputs and outputs of a node). So this is a generic name to refer to Inputs and Outputs. Link -> The connection between two connectors. > "Terminal" and > "Connector" > may actually be confusing terms in Peep. Well, even in Peep nodes have inputs and output. You might not explicitly see them (ie. you only see links or pipes or whatever, as in the command line) but they are there. We need a way to refer to the things that make up the connections, and this should be separate from the name of a connection. Does this make any sense? What do you all think? Brad