[Pipet Devel] sessions (was: we're back)
J.W. Bizzaro
bizzaro at geoserve.net
Fri Mar 3 00:22:12 EST 2000
Brad Chapman wrote:
>
> So, the point of all this is that all communication is through a
> single local port, and so shouldn't be affected by firewalls. I'd be
> interested if you tried to fire behind your firewall, Jennifer, and
> see what happens.
For those who have used 'port sniffers', can a loopback like this be detected?
> Once we get into middle to middle communication, we'll need to
> worry about connecting between two computers, in which case firewalls
> and security will become an issue.
As it is for all applications communicating through the Internet.
> I'm going to argue for using corba
> to do this, and not sockets, so maybe security and firewall
> compatibility can be one of my arguments. Thanks!
What makes CORBA more secure and more 'compatible' with firewalls?
Cheers.
Jeff
--
+----------------------------------+
| J.W. Bizzaro |
| |
| http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ |
| |
| BIOINFORMATICS.ORG |
| The Open Lab |
| |
| http://bioinformatics.org/ |
+----------------------------------+
More information about the Pipet-Devel
mailing list