> > > We CANNOT thow GMS away. Jarl simply wouldn't collaborate if we did. > > > > No one is questioning if Overflow is capable of distributing applications. > > The issue is much more political than technical. > > My argument is not that much that I want Overflow to "take over everything", but > the fact that I think it would work better if we can have only one application, > instead of one for complex stuff and one for fast stuff. ...and I think it would > be feasable in Overflow. > Why not (I thing it's what Jeff said before) : come to a common GUI-core API, so Overflow and GMS will continue, and user can deside which core fullfills their needs? Or will this GUI be impossible to build?