> > I thought that we could keep both the streaming XML dialog *and* > CORBA, but just in two different places in the program. My idea was > that we could keep the small middle that we have in Loci right now to > communiate with the GUI front via the streaming XML dialog you > describe. A kinda 'script interpeter'.. very good idear > > move through a work flow diagram in an even "smarter" way (ie. based > on the fastest way to implement it) which is what Jarl seems to be > proposing for GMS's with the neural net and genetic algorithms > processor. Yes. The GAP will also try to apply new succesfull structures that are generated elsewhere. > Does this make any sense? I think this gives us a lot of reuse of > code, while maintaing the streaming XML that Jeff digs and the > CORBA/API interfaces of Overflow and GMS. OK to me. It would also be a very good point for you to start working on.