[Pipet Devel] node-to-node communication: you can have it 3 ways!

[J.W. Bizzaro]

jarl van katwijk wrote:
> 
> Because it's too unpredictable: it's very easy to create a 'overflow' compatible
> program that exploits this detail\low level.
> Jean, any comments?

Okay, if you think so.

> Ic, but this is where gms is (going to be) powerfull, let the overflow layer
> specialise in
> processing, let gms do the brokering\security and client\script IO.
> It's a question of orientation of the layers. Of the design. Like a
> OS kernel: diff. layers
> are seperated from each other for a reason, so it's possible to remain the
> overview of
> the situation and to be able to implement new idears easely.

I agree.

> > My point is LITTLE NODES CAN COMMUNICATE ACROSS THE INTERNET TOO! :-)
> 
> Yes, they can, only they talk to an application or the gms layer, nerver to an
> other subnet.

Good.

If Jean-Marc agrees, then I have no problem with your point of view.  I'm just
considering the best inter-personal or political solution.

Jeff
-- 
                      +----------------------------------+
                      |           J.W. Bizzaro           |
                      |                                  |
                      | http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ |
                      |                                  |
                      |        BIOINFORMATICS.ORG        |
                      |           The Open Lab           |
                      |                                  |
                      |    http://bioinformatics.org/    |
                      +----------------------------------+