Sorry to be so slow in responding... dumb finals... > What is the difference between LaTeX and TeX? TeX is actually what does all of the beautiful typesetting. This was developed by Donald E. Knuth, and only contained some pretty basic macros to work with it. These macros are pretty hard core and difficult to learn, so eventually Leslie Lamport developed LaTeX, which in a more accessable set of macros to work with the underlying typesetting engine. You lose some power and flexibility using LaTeX, but it is definately made up for by being a lot easier to learn and use. I am not nearly experienced enough with it to even touch TeX yet. All I know if that the day I discovered LaTeX was the day I said goodbye to horrible horrible Microsoft Word > Gary and David were starting (very preliminary) to document Loci with > DocBook. Can someone explain why DocBook might or might not be better than > LyX/LaTeX? In my mind, LaTeX is a better choice. I think the most difficult thing about LaTeX is learning it, and getting all of the tools working on your system to generate the right kind of documentation. However, it seems like LyX helps a lot in this regard. The advantage of DocBook is that the tools are more easily installed and "standard" so it is probably easier to set up, and is also easier for other users to generate all kinds of different documentation from the raw SGML. With LaTeX you have to have all of the right packages and other stuff installed to generate ps/pdf documentation right from the original .tex source, so this is more likely to be difficult (I know that it is a problem mentioned on some of the python lists--since python uses LaTeX for documentation). However, I think we could get around this by having a non-bulky readible format (like html) included along with the .tex files, so then users who don't care about producing documentation from the source and just want something to read have the html to look at. Just my thoughts on this... Brad