> I think at least part of the work can be done by "regular" Overflow (pl) nodes. > Just as Overflow defines Probes (which can be viewed as "breakpoints"), we could > have log nodes that log whatever data "passes through them" and send the log to > a central logging system that would correspond to the GMS part. Does that make > sense? [forgot this:] We there be need for scheduling overflow\PL nodes? I rather see whole subnets batched as a whole. Or does Overflow need\wants this?