[Pipet Devel] XML descriptions for loci

[J.W. Bizzaro]

Brad Chapman wrote:
> 
> That's becuase I'm doing it stupidly :-). I think the way you are
> proposing above is better than my stupid way with a whole bunch of
> tags. So maybe we should just have:
> 
> <locus name = 'unix.utils.ls'>
> <locus name = 'General.Constant'>
> <locus name = 'IO.NetExec'>
> <locus name = 'Logic.Mux'>
> 
> (to use some earlier examples) and just drop the whole module thing
> entirely (then we can drop <piperplugin> as well, since I just added
> that to have a root element). I like this a lot, as it will help get
> rid of a ton of my extraneous tags and attributes. Anyone else like
> this way better?

Yes, much better :-)

BTW, will the hierarchy (this.that.theotherthing) be reflected in locus
storage?  IOW, will Piper know any more about the hierarchy than what can be
gleaned from the name?

Jeff
-- 
                      +----------------------------------+
                      |           J.W. Bizzaro           |
                      |                                  |
                      | http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ |
                      |                                  |
                      |        BIOINFORMATICS.ORG        |
                      |           The Open Lab           |
                      |                                  |
                      |    http://bioinformatics.org/    |
                      +----------------------------------+