Brad Chapman wrote: > > I don't know Jeff, I think you should let this drop. It doesn't seem like > a big deal and we have already started using grandma, mother and baby for > things. We are really over-analyzing the whole thing. I think you should > just go with the majority on this one :-). Hey, haven't I come up with some great names so far? :-) Just don't get carried away with the theme and start calling parts of the BBL, "Diaper", "Pacifier", "Bottle", etc. ;-) > I don't think this is correct. Jarl's document seems to make an explicit > point that there is only one BL (Parent) per Piper program running. So > the DL will only communicate with one BL. The BL itself will be > responsible for splitting processes up using the whole Mother to Baby > thing. At least, this is my understanding. Oh, so one mother per grandma, and many babies per mother? Jeff -- J.W. Bizzaro jeff at bioinformatics.org Director, Bioinformatics.org: The Open Lab http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." -- Martin Luther King, Jr. --