Jeff wrote: [mother-child stuff] > I don't know. It just sounds corny to me. If you use "grandparent", > "parent", "child" (no discrimination against grandpa's and fathers > ;-)), it's fine with me. I don't know Jeff, I think you should let this drop. It doesn't seem like a big deal and we have already started using grandma, mother and baby for things. We are really over-analyzing the whole thing. I think you should just go with the majority on this one :-). > BWT, did I get this right? > > Part of the DL code base. Spawns or communicates with > multiple Parents. I don't think this is correct. Jarl's document seems to make an explicit point that there is only one BL (Parent) per Piper program running. So the DL will only communicate with one BL. The BL itself will be responsible for splitting processes up using the whole Mother to Baby thing. At least, this is my understanding. Brad