I just wanted to emphasize something at this point. We have a number of people coming together with different interests, and I think that is great. But, because Piper is not focused on a particular application, that doesn't mean Piper is unsuitable for it. I don't want people to think that, because it is not true. Take GNOME as an example. GNOME is a general-purpose system. But, because it is being used to write games by some people, that doesn't mean GNOME can't be used to write other things, such as productivity applications. Likewise, because Piper might be use to build non-scientific systems, that doesn't mean Piper can't be used to build scientific systems. It has been my conviction that a general-purpose system will attract developers and users with all sorts of interests, and that that will lead to the development of things that can be used by developers with special interests. For example, signal processing tools may be useful to bioinformaticists, and visa versa. And, bioinformatics tools may be useful to business people, and visa versa. That's not even to mention that more developers and more users will mean a more developed infrastructure and more eyes to catch bugs. The more the merrier :-) Cheers. Jeff -- J.W. Bizzaro jeff at bioinformatics.org Director, Bioinformatics.org: The Open Lab http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff "Injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere." -- Martin Luther King, Jr. --