Jarl van Katwijk wrote: > > > Otherwise, we'll probably have to distribute the library separately. That's > > the only legal alternative. > Arf. That would suck, because I already dislike the large number of dependancies > that need to be installed for Piper. Yeah, it would suck. Would *COULD* include it with Piper, but we would need to write an exception to our own license (a modification of the L/GPL), and we would have to say that Piper has a mixed license, which I think would suck equally. Let me know if you have any luck contacting the authors. If you don't, I'll give it a try. I may have to contact Lockheed or whoever by phone, but if I reach the legal department, I'M *POSITIVE* that they *WON'T* let us have it or change the license (lawyers). Jeff -- J.W. Bizzaro jeff at bioinformatics.org Director, Bioinformatics.org: The Open Lab http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff "All those scientists--they're all alike! They say they're working for us, but what they really want is to rule the world!" -- Angry Villager, Young Frankenstein --