"J.W. Bizzaro" a écrit : > > Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > > > Overflow does *compile* with 2.96, but not everything works as it's supposed to > > (don't know yet whether the problem is my code or gcc 2.96) > > Just an academic question here: Is the problem that we're having with GCC 2.96 > related to C++ standards changing? Again, I'm not a C/C++ expert, but I'm a > little surprised that a "minor" upgrade in GCC can break so many things. Oh, and BTW, these a couple things that I have to refrain from doing because g++ 2.95.x won't take them. It has to do with libstdc++ v2, which doesn't quite follow the standard. When all compilers strictly follow the ANSI C++ standard, my life will be much much simpler (that is as far as Overflow is concerned). Jean-Marc