Jean-Marc Valin wrote: > > > We don't have to choose one or the other for everything. There's nothing > > wrong with: > > > > Local: CORBA > > (UIL <--> DL <--> BL <--> PL) > > > > Remote: SOAP or Fipa > > (BL <--> BL or DL <--> DL) > > > > Or is there? > > If CORBA becomes only for local use, then why not use something like > SysV IPC (shm, messages, ...) which is much faster. > Because corba offers that we are able to create the layers in any language and hosting hardware. Good corba implementations use shm e.a. for it's ipc. jarl