Bioinformatics.org
[NEU MS in Health Informatics]
Not logged in
  • Log in
  • Bioinformatics.org
    Membership (37570+) Group hosting [?]
  • Wiki
  • Franklin Award
  • Sponsorships
  • Careers
    About bioinformatics
    Bioinformatics training
    Bioinformatics jobs

    Research
    All information groups
    Online databases Online analysis tools Online education tools More tools

    Development
    All software groups
    FTP repository
    SVN & CVS repositories [?]
    Mailing lists

    Forums
    News & Commentary
  • Submit
  • Archives
  • Subscribe

  • Jobs Forum
    (Career Center)
  • Submit
  • Archives
  • Subscribe
  • News & Commentary - Message forums

    Microsoft to lobby US Govt.? Part III
    Submitted by J.W. Bizzaro; posted on Thursday, August 15, 2002

    Submitter

    Is Microsoft going to lobby the US Government to prevent the use of GNU-licensed software in publicly funded projects? That was the question I proposed in the first news item about this, back in February of 2001. But it's not a question anymore. Yes, they are and have been. Here's a News.com article about it, by Matthew Broersma:

    ``Microsoft and other software companies are ramping up a lobbying effort that aims to convince governments to think again about adopting open-source software.

    ``The Initiative for Software Choice, which launched quietly in early May, is chaired by an industry body called the Computer Technology Industry Association (CompTIA), but its biggest software industry backer is Microsoft. Other supporters include Intel and software industry groups from countries in Europe and elsewhere.
    [...]
    ``While Software Choice's principles rarely mention open-source initiatives directly, they include a provision that governments should promote a `broad availability' of the results of publicly funded research by making sure these results are kept clear of such open-source licenses as the GNU General Public License (GPL), used by Linux.

    ```When public funds are used to support software research and development, the innovations that result from this work should be licensed in ways that take into account both the desirability of broadly sharing those advances as well as the desirability of applying those advances to commercialized products,' the group stated.
    [...]
    ``Open-source advocate Bruce Perens said that Software Choice's policies are a deceptive campaign designed to lock open source out of the public sector. `Their policies are written to maintain an unfair bias for proprietary software in the market,' Perens wrote on the Web site Sincere Choice, which he created to oppose Software Choice's lobbying efforts.''

    Full story:
    news.com.com/2100[...]d_top

    Sincere Choice:
    www.sincerechoice.org

    Part I: bioinformatics.org/foru[...]d=396
    Part II: bioinformatics.org/foru[...]d=817

    Expanded view | Monitor forum | Save place

    Start a new thread:
    You have to be logged in to post a reply.

     

    Copyright © 2016 · Scilico, LLC