On Mon, May 20, 2002 at 03:50:42PM +0300, Tommi Hassinen wrote: > > So, do we need finer granularity of the mpqc-version or do we outlaw > > 2.0.x? > > Finer granularity could be an investment in future. What about an > 3-digit or 4-digit version numbers like ABC or ABCC where > > A = major > B = minor > C = micro > > version number? I you guys give me the version information, I promise I'll > do the rest! :) If you're talking about MPQC_VERSION, it's probably as easy as doing AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(MPQC_MAJOR_VERSION, $SC_MAJOR_VERSION) AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(MPQC_MINOR_VERSION, $SC_MINOR_VERSION) AC_DEFINE_UNQUOTED(MPQC_MICRO_VERSION, $SC_MICRO_VERSION) to configure.in and the appropriate statements in config.h.in. MAJOR_VERSION is 1 or 2, and MINOR can be 0 or 1 if MAJOR is 2 at the moment. So we can do something similar to #if(MPQC_MAJOR_VERSION > 1 && MPQC_MINOR_VERSION > 0) using namespace sc; #ENDIF BTW, ghemical seems to compile fine with 2.0.4 when I comment that using namespace sc; statement. bye, Michael