> > > > I've better feelings about a peer-2-peer structure, like > > gnutmeg - http://sourceforge.net/project/?group_id=3965 > > > > Maybe only register the locations (inet addresses) of the systems where instaces > > of VSH are running? > > Napster has an interesting security feature, even if it was unintentional: You > don't connect directly to a remote system. You connect to the Napster server, > and the Napster server connects to the remote system. How would something > like that jive with our plans? > Those are the good things, but what about the networkload a central server will get? And what if that server crashes? bye, jarl