[Pipet Devel] progress on pied

Brad Chapman chapmanb at arches.uga.edu
Wed Aug 2 22:35:21 EDT 2000


Jeff wrote:
> Jeff's little dangling thingy
>  should be called

Jeff, I really think you leave personal issues like this off the mailing
list :-)

Seriously,

>    (1) Link
>    (2) Connector
>    (3) Linker
>    (4) Branch
>    (5) Line
>    (6) Thingy

I vote strongly for "connector" and "connection" because this is already
what we are using right now. All of these really say the same thing, so
why not just stick with what we have and minimize our re-naming headaches
as much a possible. I'd rather worry about adding new functionality to
Piper rather than shuffling names around, so if we can make it less
painless, I vote for that!

Brad





More information about the Pipet-Devel mailing list