Brad Chapman wrote: > > I vote strongly for "connector" and "connection" because this is already > what we are using right now. All of these really say the same thing, so > why not just stick with what we have and minimize our re-naming headaches > as much a possible. I'd rather worry about adding new functionality to > Piper rather than shuffling names around, so if we can make it less > painless, I vote for that! Are you suggesting then that the .n files use <connection> tags rather than <link> tags? Jeff -- J.W. Bizzaro jeff at bioinformatics.org Director, Bioinformatics.org: The Open Lab http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff "Let the machine do the dirty work." -- Kernighan and Ritchie --