> Are you suggesting then that the .n files use <connection> tags rather> than > <link> tags? Eh, right, forgot about them :-). I am suggesting that we leave both alone for right now. In my mind it seems unambiguous and I'm not getting confused. I do not want to touch the .n format for fear of making Jean-Marc's Overflow stuff be incompatible with Piper. I also do not really want to change very much code just for naming issues. Changing names is a painful and unenjoyable exercise for me and the dl is already enough of a mess right now since I just had to rewrite it yet again to incorporate Jean-Marc's plan. So unless people are really confused by the naming, I again vote to be lazy and leave things the way they are. Brad