jarl van katwijk wrote: > > As I mentioned earlier: the first subject of discussion should be the differance > between the classes\objects 'filosophy' of both systems.. I think your choose > to implement different types based upon functionality isn't the way it should be > done. I'm supporting the 'one global do-everything object". > > I'm very curious why Loci classes are implemented the way they are... Perhaps you can give us a synopsis/summary of the GMS object philosophy. It would then be easier for me to point out differences, because right now I'm not so sure how GMS is different. Jeff -- +----------------------------------+ | J.W. Bizzaro | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/~jeff/ | | | | BIOINFORMATICS.ORG | | The Open Lab | | | | http://bioinformatics.org/ | +----------------------------------+